🔗 Share this article Latvian Lawmakers Vote to Withdraw From Treaty on Safeguarding Females from Abuse Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week The decision represents a blow for the nation's conservative-leaning government leader, who spoke to protesters outside the legislative assembly Latvia's parliament members have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the legislature. Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law. Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop laws and assistance programs to end all forms of violence. The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for gender equality. Ideological Controversy and Opposition The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology". Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties. The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly. Ideological Disagreements and Reactions One of the primary parties supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities". The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them". The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and abroad. Twenty-two thousand individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people. International Concerns and Possible Future Actions The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent". He noted that since Turkey left the convention in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly. Because the decision did not secure a supermajority support, the president could possibly send back the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections. President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than belief-based viewpoints". Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body. "This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate. Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in several EU countries The European treaty requires particular legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse The nation's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional EU countries